No, not malaria, ...( 10 months ago by avianmosquito)
No, not malaria, birdflu.
Adrenalin is the ...( 10 months ago by avianmosquito)
Adrenalin is the key here.
1. Unless you were trying to kill them, they wouldn't have access to 80% of their strength. 70% of human muscle is inactive except in emergencies, and the individual strands gain a bonus in strength in such circumstances.
2. Also, it would take a swing to do that much damage, the typical jab has less than a third of the energy.
3. Tell them to try aiming for the kidneys next time.
Hmm I'll keep that ...( 10 months ago by LLDQ911)
Hmm I'll keep that in mind
1. When I said "at ...( 10 months ago by avianmosquito)
1. When I said "at a distance" for the kalashnikov's energy, I meant at about 200m. There the energy is about 1000j and the momentum is about 2n*s.
Compare this to a swing from an enraged 5 year old, which would be about 1000j and 55n*s.
This means most of the energy of a bullet would spread out across the armour, whereas a punch would carry right through it.
The bullet would leave a minor bruise, the punch would cause internal bleeding, br oken bones, possible organ failure, etcetera.
Im saying (against ...( 10 months ago by LLDQ911)
Im saying (against ammunition) thats some pretty good armor
It's built to stop ...( 10 months ago by avianmosquito)
It's built to stop bullets, nothing else is really all that important. But, for the sake of being thorough, let's go over its resistance to every form of trauma I can think of.
Radiation: Moderate.
Abrasion: High
Concussion: High
Blunt force: Extemely low
Penetration: Extremely high
Laceration: Moderate
Liquid penetration: High
Heat: High
Poison: Low
Overall, I think that makes it good against anything except chemical/biological weapons and sheer brute force.
if you want to hurt ...( 10 months ago by bestSVMS)
if you want to hurt someone, based on your info
your better off punching them instead of shooting them
i saw that before
...( 10 months ago by bestSVMS)
i saw that before
it wasnt devoloped for the military, it was made for rich people.I think they used a relitivly low power gun compared to ^
and it might no be as good under bad conditions
Under normal ...( 10 months ago by avianmosquito)
Under normal circumstances, a bullet would be far more lethal because it punches a hole in the target, causing a large amount of both internal and external bleeding.
A punch works differently. It works by forcing bone and tissue apart, causing breaks and tears. This is more or less the same mechanism as a bullet, but due to the sheer increase in surface area it has much less pressure, and pressure is what causes penetration.
However, through body armour they behave the same way.
Actually, for sheer ...( 10 months ago by avianmosquito)
Actually, for sheer damage a sword or axe would be the best weapon.
at 1:47 the bullet ...( 10 months ago by tarmack520)
at 1:47 the bullet bounces off!!!!!!!!!!
agreed, fuck the ...( 10 months ago by panterajoey)
agreed, fuck the army and the united stated government. its all about saving money, obviously. otherwise we'de all be running around in titanium exoskeletal combat suits!!lol
Except I can't ...( 10 months ago by thehotshirtguy2008)
Except I can't throw a punch at 2700 fps.
The only defect the ...( 10 months ago by thehotshirtguy2008)
The only defect the federal government considers is cost. If we get into a war where were lose more soldiers we will probably get Dragon Skin. Because it will then be a political issue.
Nobody can, but ...( 10 months ago by avianmosquito)
Nobody can, but does it matter at close range?
You can't really use a gun when somebody is right in your face, especially since the damn thing takes half a dozen shots and a good five minutes of waiting to kill somebody. Guns have nil stopping power when compared to most other weapons, the only thing they beat are punches.
But... guns are sim ple to use, take no physical effort, work at almost all ranges and fire rapidly, and most make good clubs when the shit hits the fan.
i saw dragonskin on ...( 10 months ago by hairesonyourchest)
i saw dragonskin on future weapons and it survived after being put on a grenade. there was't a scratch on the manekin.
so if someone is ...( 10 months ago by f1rehawkZ)
so if someone is hit by a .50 they wont be torn in half but instead will need to bleed out for 5 minutes?
Dragon Skin stops ...( 10 months ago by Tantrumkilla)
Dragon Skin stops working at high temps. Whats in Iraq? Very high temps.
Also avian mosquito, a gun can easily be shot when someone is in your face, a hollow point round a a.60 round can cause a massive amount of damage and are meant for killing. Also you are saying that a bullet flying through your heart, brain, leg, arm, or any other part of body does not stop you?
fuk u bitch !( 10 months ago by chewang07)
fuk u bitch !
the dragon skin ...( 10 months ago by bookybabora)
the dragon skin DOES NOT stop working at high temps that was some bs that was put out as an excuse. Think about how hot a fucking bullet is.
BestSVMS, they used ...( 10 months ago by bloody6mortician)
BestSVMS, they used a 7.62x51mm M14 rifle. It has a high power round; as it is the same caliber used by most US sniper rifles and many commercial medium-large game hunting rifles. You can clearly see the power of the rifle by the way it completely penetrated the 1" steel plate armor and still traveled all the way through the mannequin.
plz search " ...( 10 months ago by surefireaccount1989)
plz search "dragonskin future weapons", although DS stops the 5.56, but it doesn't stop the AK's round. The AK round completely penetrates the armor. The insurgents in Iraq shoots AKs but not M4s. So the US govt has its reasons to forbid troops to use the DS.
Dude, what are you ...( 10 months ago by xvidzzz)
Dude, what are you talking about? I just watched the DragonSkin Future Weapons video. It stopped both the AK and M4 rounds.
Sorry for being ...( 10 months ago by MistahJericho6996)
1. Unless you were trying to kill them, they wouldn't have access to 80% of their strength. 70% of human muscle is inactive except in emergencies, and the individual strands gain a bonus in strength in such circumstances.
2. Also, it would take a swing to do that much damage, the typical jab has less than a third of the energy.
3. Tell them to try aiming for the kidneys next time.
Compare this to a swing from an enraged 5 year old, which would be about 1000j and 55n*s. This means most of the energy of a bullet would spread out across the armour, whereas a punch would carry right through it. The bullet would leave a minor bruise, the punch would cause internal bleeding, br
oken bones, possible organ failure, etcetera.
Radiation: Moderate. Abrasion: High Concussion: High Blunt force: Extemely low Penetration: Extremely high Laceration: Moderate Liquid penetration: High Heat: High Poison: Low Overall, I think that makes it good against anything except chemical/biological weapons and sheer brute force.
A punch works differently. It works by forcing bone and tissue apart, causing breaks and tears. This is more or less the same mechanism as a bullet, but due to the sheer increase in surface area it has much less pressure, and pressure is what causes penetration. However, through body armour they
behave the same way.
You can't really use a gun when somebody is right in your face, especially since the damn thing takes half a dozen shots and a good five minutes of waiting to kill somebody. Guns have nil stopping power when compared to most other weapons, the only thing they beat are punches. But... guns are sim
ple to use, take no physical effort, work at almost all ranges and fire rapidly, and most make good clubs when the shit hits the fan.